Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04553
Original file (BC 2013 04553.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04553

				COUNSEL:  NONE

				HEARING DESIRED:  NO



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her late ex-husband’s records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for spouse coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), naming the applicant as the beneficiary.  


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She was unjustly denied former spouse annuity payments under RCSBP.  In accordance with the property settlement of their divorce, the deceased former member was required to name her as the irrevocable beneficiary on his RCSBP.  Both the divorce property settlement and the Qualified Domestic Relation Order (QDRO) state several times that he was supposed to do this.  After the divorce, she asked him several times if this was in order, and he told her it was.  After his death, she was notified by AFPC that he had not named her as beneficiary, but instead, had deferred naming anyone until he turned 60 years of age.  Until his death, she was unaware that he had failed to make the required designation.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

According to the documentation submitted by the applicant, her husband passed away on 21 Jun 13, and, to date, she has not remarried.  However, the deceased former member was married to someone other than the applicant at the time of his death.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit C.



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice.  On 6 Jun 02, the deceased former member made an RCSBP election for Option C, “Immediate Annuity” for spouse only coverage.  On 28 Jul 04, the deceased former member and the applicant divorced.  A final Divorce Decree, QDRO, and Settlement Agreement were issued.  The court awarded former spouse coverage under the RCSBP to the applicant.  However, neither the deceased member nor the applicant notified AFPC of the change of marital status within the required timeframe.  Title 10, U.S.C, Subsection 1443(3)(A)(iii), requires that any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce, dissolution, or annulment.  The applicant claimed that the deceased former member assured her several times that he had designated her as a former spouse under RCSBP, but the required action was not accomplished in compliance with law.  On 21 Jun 13, the member passed away.  However, based on not receiving notification of the marital change within one year along with an RCSBP Former Spouse Coverage form, the RCSBP election was automatically updated to reflect Option A “Decline To Make An Election Until Age 60.”

A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTT evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

She reiterates that her deceased ex-husband assured her several times that he had notified AFPC of the change in their marital status and filed all the necessary forms to ensure she received her portion should he pass away.  In addition, she submitted a letter she received from the lawyer her ex-husband hired to handle the military benefits portion of their divorce, which stated “the survivor benefit was set up and is in place.”  Further, she called ARPC to confirm that all was in place, and was told that everything was done.  Her portion of his military retirement was to be the bulk of her retirement income.  She has very little other retirement income because she spent 20 years of her adult life supporting him and his career (Exhibit D).


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission, to include her rebuttal response to the advisory opinion, in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  While the applicant has presented documentary evidence indicating that her deceased former spouse’s attorney submitted the deemed election required in 2006, even if we were convinced there was an error on the part of the Air Force in not accepting the deemed election described in the letter provided by the applicant, we are not convinced that she has demonstrated that extraordinary circumstances exist in this case that are required for this Board to grant relief in contravention of our previous decisions involving similar cases.  The AFBCMR has consistently refused to grant similar applications where there is a spouse with a legal entitlement to this benefit, unless that spouse relinquishes his/her right to this entitlement in a notarized statement.  However, in this case, the applicant has indicated that there is a potential competing interest for SBP benefits as her deceased former spouse was married at the time of his death.  Therefore, absent the consent of the deceased former member’s widow, we do not find there are extraordinary circumstances here that would cause us to render a determination that would serve to extinguish the legal rights of another party in contravention of our long-standing practice in similar cases.  Therefore, because such an action would deprive the widow of a legal entitlement, granting the application is not appropriate in these circumstances.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04553 in Executive Session on 22 Nov 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04553 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 19 Sep 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, ARPC/DPTT, dated 3 Dec 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Jan 14.
	Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 25 Sep 14.
	Exhibit F.  Letter, Applicant, dated 17 Oct 14, w/atch. 
					


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05695

    Original file (BC 2013 05695.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Records indicate that he did not make an election within the required time period prescribed by U.S.C. Based on the evidence before us it appears the deceased service member was properly...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 01718

    Original file (BC 2012 01718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPTT states the member and/or his former spouse had one year from the date of the QDRO, dated 9 Oct 01, to make a former spouse deemed election to the Secretary concerned. He states the QDRO does not provide the required “election data” necessary to complete the SBP enrollment form. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05388

    Original file (BC 2013 05388.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her deceased husband and she thought they had complied with the marriage reporting requirements of the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), when their marriage data was entered in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) upon being issued new military ID cards on 4 Feb 11, less than two months after being married on 16 Dec 10. ARPC/DPTT has no record of the deceased member or his spouse reporting the marital change within the required...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00302

    Original file (BC-2011-00302.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her request, the applicant provides an expanded statement and copies of a divorce decree, power of attorney, and DD Form 2293, Application for Former Spouse Payments from Retired Pay. The divorce did not award the former spouse coverage under the RCSBP; however, neither the member nor his former spouse deemed an election for former spouse coverage under the RCSBP. The applicant contends that her deceased former husband’s Parkinson’s disease impacted his ability to make a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01862

    Original file (BC-2012-01862.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of DD Form 2656-10, Final Decree of Divorce, Domestic Relations Order [Military Retirement], letters from her attorney, letters from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) and numerous other documents in support of her request. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 27 Jul 2012, copies of the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to the applicant and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018472

    Original file (20110018472.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests correction of the FSM's records to show he changed his SBP election from spouse to former spouse coverage. However, DFAS was unable to release any detailed information pertaining to the FSM's retired pay account due to the Privacy Act of 1974. l. ABCMR Docket Number AR2003083486, dated 27 March 2003, corrected the military records of a FSM to show that the FSM requested to change his SBP coverage to former spouse and children coverage and that his request was received and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03816

    Original file (BC 2014 03816.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03816 COUNSEL: NONE (SERVICE MEMBER) HEARING DESIRED: NO (APPLICANT) APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her former spouse’s records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for former spouse coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). There is no evidence the applicant or the service members submitted an election within the required timeframe. While we...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00793

    Original file (BC-2011-00793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 Aug 1994, the decedent and the applicant divorced. If the documents were provided within the required timeframe, DPTT would have been unable to update the member's RCSBP election due to the member not electing to participate in the Plan when eligible. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In further support of her request, the applicant provides two letters.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00700

    Original file (BC-2011-00700.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00700 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s records be corrected to reflect that he made an election for spouse coverage with immediate coverage based on full retired pay under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05091

    Original file (BC 2012 05091.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the deceased service member be corrected to show that on 31 Dec 02, he elected spouse only Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage based on full retired pay. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05091 in Executive Session on...